نوع مقاله : پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 عضو گروه اصول پژوهشگاه مرکز فقهی ائمه اطهار (ع)، قم، ایران.
2 استاد سطوح عالی حوزه علمیه، قم، ایران.
3 استاد مرکز فقهی ائمه اطهار( ع)، قم، ایران.
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
With the increasing prevalence of cryptocurrencies in virtual environments, various Islamic jurisprudential questions have arisen. The permissibility of Bitcoin transactions is one of the most important issues, as Bitcoin has become widely used among cryptocurrency traders. Some jurists have declared Bitcoin invalid by citing the prohibition of gharar (excessive uncertainty) in transactions. This study, based on a review of library sources, examines the concept of gharar and its applications in Islamic jurisprudence to evaluate its relevance to Bitcoin and its trading. The findings show that jurists have described gharar in sales with three main meanings: risk, ignorance, and deception; however, none of these meanings justify invalidating Bitcoin transactions. Furthermore, jurists who invalidate transactions due to gharar do so under specific conditions: (1) when there is no ability to deliver the countervalues; (2) when the countervalues are unknown; (3) when the subject of the transaction lacks rational benefit; or (4) when the subject is not ownable—none of which apply to Bitcoin or its trading. Therefore, neither the definitions nor the jurisprudential applications of gharar support declaring Bitcoin transactions invalid.
کلیدواژهها [English]
)